| Objective To establish an obliterative airway disease animal model and explore the epithelial kinetics following trachea transplantation.Method Allografts and isografts were obtained by transplanting BALB/c tracheas into C57BL/6(Groupâ…¡,â…¢) and BALB/c(Groupâ… ), respectively. Grafts were transplanted into a subcutaneous pouch in the dorsal surface of recipient mouse.Groupâ…¢were injected with cyclosporin 25mg/kg/day intraperitoneal, from the first day post-implantation to the day of graft harvest. Animals were harvested at days 3, 7, 14, 21 and 30 after trachea transplantation. BrdU injection occurred on the day of graft harvest as outlined below. Grafts were removed for histology, computerized morphometry, BrdU labelling index and TUNEL positive cells.Results Morphometry:In groupâ… ,on day 3 epithelium minor injuried and mucosal edema. On day 7, 14, 21 after transplantation, gradually epithelium recovered normal, mucosal edema lessen and recovered normal. on day 30 epithelium approached to normal; In groupâ…¡, on day 3 after transplantation epithelium minor injuried , epithelium segregated lamina propria partly and mucosal edema. On day 7, 14, 21 cilia lost, epithelium slough and necrosis with abundant fibrous tissue and lymphocyte. On day 30 epithelium completely disappeared. Lumens were obturated by fibrous tissue and obliterated. In groupâ…¢, epithelium minor injuried , epithelium segregated lamina propria partly and mucosal edema on day 3 after transplantation. On day 7, 14, 21 cilia lost, epithelium slough and necrosis with abundant fibrous tissue and lymphocyte. On day 30 cilia lost, epithelium slough and necrosis with abundant fibrous tissue and lymphocyte. Fibrous tissue and lymphocyte were less than Groupâ…¡. Proliferation of fibrous tissue obviously, but a little epithelium can be seen. Lumens were obturated by fibrous tissue and obliterated. On day 3 after transplantation the percentage of ciliary coverage in the three group was similar(p>0.05) and greater than 90%. On day 7 after transplantation the percentage of ciliary coverage of groupâ… ,â…¡andâ…¢was 94% and 80%, respectively. the percentage of ciliary coverage of groupâ… was much more than that of groupâ…¡and groupâ…¢(p=0.000,p=0.001).. On day 14 after transplantation the percentage of ciliary coverage of groupâ…¡andâ…¢was 55% and 71%,. respectively . The percentage of ciliary coverage of groupâ…¡andâ…¢was much less than that of groupâ… (p=0.000,p=0.000). The percentage of ciliary coverage of groupâ…¡was signifiance compared to groupâ…¢.On day 21 after transplantation the percentage of ciliary coverage of groupâ…¡andâ…¢was 15% and 63%,. respectively . The percentage of ciliary coverage of groupâ…¡andâ…¢was much less than that of groupâ… (p=0.000,p=0.000). On day 30 after transplantation the percentage of ciliary coverage of groupâ…¡andâ…¢was less than 5% and much less than groupâ… (p=0.000). The extent of BrdU labelling index of groupâ… was 3~5%. On day 3 after transplantation groupâ…¡was signifiance compared to that of groupâ… andâ…¢.On day 7 after transplantation BrdU labelling index of groupâ…¡was 15%,and much more than that of groupâ… andâ…¢(p=0.000,p=0.001). The peak of BrdU labelling index of groupâ…¡andâ…¢was on day 14 , groupâ…¡was signifiance compared to that of groupâ… and groupâ…¢(p=0.000, p=0.000). On day 21 after transplantation BrdU labelling index of groupâ…¡was much more than that of groupâ… andâ…¢(p=0.000,p=0.002). On day 30 after transplantation BrdU labelling index of groupâ…¡andâ…¢degraded obviously, and especially the groupâ…¡. The extent of TUNEL positive cells of groupâ… was 3~4.On day 3 after transplantation TUNEL positive cells of the three group was similar (p>0.05). On day 7 after transplantation TUNEL positive cells of groupâ…¡andâ…¢were much more than groupâ… (p=0.000,p=0.000). The peak of UNEL positive cells of groupâ…¢was on day 14 ,and TUNEL positive cells of groupâ…¡and groupâ…¢was much more than that of groupâ… (p=0.000,p=0.000). The peak of UNEL positive cells of groupâ…¡was on day 21 after transplantation , and TUNEL positive cells of groupâ…¡and groupâ…¢was much more than that of groupâ… (p=0.000,p=0.000). On day 30 after transplantation TUNEL positive cells of groupâ… was similar with groupâ…¡and groupâ…¢(p=0.613, p=0.061).Conclusion 1.In the alloimmune environment, impaired airway epithelium increased proliferation of numerous airway epithelial cells. Numerous S phase airway epithelial cells unable to progress through mitosis and shunted into an apoptotic pathway. The allograft epithelium by actively regenerating serves as a self-renewing source of antigen, and thus increase the injury of airway epithelium .Airway epithelium growed arrest and accelerated apoptosis,so this leaded to OAD.2.Cyclosporin delays but does not eliminate fibration ,and its protectiong of airway epithelium was limited. |