Font Size: a A A

A Radiological Comparison Between Artificial Vertebra By N HA/PA66 And Iliac Crest Autograft In Anterior Cervical Decompression And Fusion

Posted on:2011-06-08Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:J M HanFull Text:PDF
GTID:2154330338479482Subject:Surgery
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
Objective: To study the stability of reconstructing cervical vertebrae with artificial vertebra by n-HA/PA66 and iliac crest autograft in anterior cervical decompression and fusion(ACDF). Methods: 38 cases of cervical spondylotic myelopathy(CSM) treated with ACDF,20 with artificial vertebra by n-HA/PA66 and dynamic plate(ABC, Aesculap, Germany),18 with iliac crest autograft and the same plate. Preoperative,1-week-after-operation,3 months-after-operation, 6 months-after-operation and the follow-up radiographs were taken, respectively. The D numerical value,the Cobb's angle and the interverberal height(HAB, height of anterior border and HPB, height of posterior border) were observed, and the data were compared statistically with the two-sample t-test check. The fusion rates were observed in the meantime by CT. Results: All patients were followed up from 6 to 15 months(mean, 9.5 months). There were no statistical differences on the changes of Cobb's angle,D numerical value,HAB and HPB from preoperative to 1 week after operation. There were statistical differences on HPB loss and Cobb's angle changes from 1 week to 3 months after operation, while no statistical differences on the changes of D numerical value and HAB. All data vary slightly after 3 months. The fusion rates were 40% and 77.8% after 3 months in artificial vertebra group and iliac crest autograft group, respectively. The grafting bones were fusioned in all patients after 9 months. Conclusions: The two materials can effectively reconstruct and keep the stability of cervical vertebrae. The artificial vertebra by n-HA/PA66 is much better than iliac crest autograft in restoring interverberal posterior height and cervical physiological curvature. The average period of time in achieving fusion of artificial vertebra is longer than that of iliac crest autograft, although both have a high fusion rate in a long-term follow-up.
Keywords/Search Tags:Cervical spine, Artificial vertebra, Iliac crest autograft, radiology
PDF Full Text Request
Related items
A Radiographic Comparison Between The Titanium Surgical Mesh And The Iliac Bone Autograft In Anterior Cervical Decompression And Fusion
Anatomic Reconstruction Of Posterior Acetabular Defects With Iliac Crest Autograft Under Persistent Osteogenic Stress: An Experiment Study
Comparasion Between The Iliac Bone Autograft And The Titanium Surgical Mesh In Anterior Cervical Decompression And Fusion On The Treatment Of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy
A Comparison Of Interbody Fusion Cage To Iliac Crest Autograft Without Plate In Anterior Cervical Discectomy And Fusion
A Biomechanical And Clinical Study On The Stress Of Inferior Intervertebral Space After Double Segments Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement
The Study Of Possible Factors Influencing Correaltionship Between The Iliac Crest Line In The Standing Position And Lumbar Aligment In Male Youth Adult Patients With Nonspecific Low Back Pain
Reliability Study And Preliminary Clinical Application Of The Upper Line Of Posterior Superior Iliac Spine Based On CT Three-Dimensional Reconstruction As A New Localization Marker For Lumbar Vertebral Segments
Analyzing The Clinical Effect Of One-stage Anterior Debridement With Iliac Crest Allograft Or Autograft In The Treatment Of Thoracolumbar Tuberculosis
The Biomechanical Study On The Stress Change And Clinical Research Of The Adjacent Superior Intervertebral Space After Double Segment Artificial Cervical Disc Replacement
10 A Radiographic Comparison Between The Iliac Bone Autograft And The Titanium Surgical Mesh In Anterior Cervical Decompression And Fusion